#Focusrite scarlett solo loopback full
#Focusrite scarlett solo loopback software

Mackie ProFX6v3 has a gain of 60 dB while Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 has a gain of 56 dB, which means Mackie has 4 dB extra gain. Mackie ProFX6v3 and Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 both have 48V phantom power, so you can connect a condenser microphone with both of these audio mixers. Quick Answer: We recommend the Mackie ProFX6v3 over the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 for every use case, such as home recording, live streaming, or live events, especially if space isn’t an issue. Both of these devices are popular for home studios, recording, and live streaming.

Perhaps the more experienced folk could benefit from having one of these lying around for tracking some demos.Let’s compare the Mackie ProFX6v3 Audio Mixer against the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Audio Interface. This interface is best suited for beginners looking to start recording some music for the first time. If you have an extra $20 to spend, why wouldn’t you just get the Duo? More inputs! Who is the M-Audio M-Track Solo best suited for?

#Focusrite scarlett solo loopback software

The M-Audio M-Track Solo audio interface wins here just for the software bundle. The Behringer is worth the extra couple bucks for the MIDAS preamps, which sound better than the Crystal pres in the M-Audio in our opinion.

We’ll let your wallet decide.Ĭheck out our Focusrite Scarlett Solo review M-Track Solo vs. While the Scarlett is the superior interface, its price tag is over double that of the M-Audio. You can also check out our pick of the best audio interfaces under $100/$50. Here are a few alternatives to compare against the M-Track Solo. You receive access to MPC Beats, as well as 20 plugins from Avid, Xpand!2 and Eleven Lite for virtual synthesis and amp emulation. The truth is that the software bundle on its own probably costs more than the actual interface. If you feel jipped, just remember what you bought it for. These things are light, and feel particularly breakable. Maybe not by that much, but you get the picture. Build quality 3.0Ĭan anybody be shocked that these are made from plastic? The truth is that if they wrapped them in an all-metal chassis it would most likely double the price. However, it is bus-powered so you don’t need to worry about supplying power to it. This is fine for recording demos on the road, or recording in an alleyway, but not much for any large scale productions.

#Focusrite scarlett solo loopback full

You might run into some technical limitations if you try to record a full band, but the soft-spoken, acoustic singer-songwriter will be just fine. Its small size and discrete appearance make it a welcome sight on a desk. At home studio 4.0Īs the name suggests, this interface is great for solo acts recording at home.

The preamps won’t give you much character, but it doesn’t sound bad by any stretch of the imagination. M-Audio boasts the inclusion of Crystal preamps on the microphone input, which sounds fine. The latency here is extremely playable, and mostly unnoticeable, especially at 128 samples. Surprisingly, the unit comes with ASIO drivers, which is something of a rarity with low-budget interfaces such as this. The gain range is fairly respectable at 0 to 54 dB on the combo-in, and -10 db to 44 dB on the instrument and line input. It offers a frequency response of 20 Hz – 20 kHz, with an SNR of 109 dB. While this is technically satisfactory, most interfaces on the market run at 24-bit with playback of at least 96 kHz. The unit has a bit depth of 16-bit, and a maximum sample rate of 48 kHz. We really wish the outputs could’ve been balanced TRS, but for a $50 interface, we’ll turn the other cheek for now. M-Track Solo audio interface (rear panel)įinally, turning around to the rear, you’ll find two unbalanced RCA outputs, as well as a USB port.